In an opening
note Johnson states that she had “always wanted to write a study about an
artist’s paranoia.” Skipton is a writer. I didn’t see a paranoid individual,
though he’s certainly deranged. He has delusions of grandeur (he believes he’s
a genius of the highest order); he’s arrogant – abusively so – and his heart
festers with an overabundance of hatred. Since his writing isn’t appreciated by
a world of fools, most of the novel concerns his machinations to get money.
He’s an artist starving in the garret – literally. People (for whom he has
extreme distaste) interest him only as potential sources of income, and he
resorts to pimping, blackmail and thievery so he can buy food and pay his rent.
This sounds grim, but it’s not. Not as Johnson presents it; she even manages to
sustain a comic tone. The writing is topnotch – lively, sometimes moving with
headlong impetuosity. The characters Skipton interacts with are a colorful
group and Bruges, Belgium is a wondrous setting. By the end – even though I was
in the mind of a warped and unsavory person – I felt pity for Skipton. In order
to convey pity I suppose Johnson also felt it. I hope she did; poor souls such
as Skipton meet with enough derision in their lives. *
King Solomon’s
Mines - H. Rider Haggard
A rip-roaring
yarn. Close escapes from the jaws of death, monstrous villains, an epic battle
that rages over several chapters, a fabulous treasure. Throughout the exotic
and gory events Allan Quartermain, the narrator, remains down-to-earth and
unheroic (he even admits that he’s a bit of a coward). His solid presence
provides a needed balance to the high drama. Haggard knew Africa and its people
well. I was interested in how a Victorian colonialist would depict the natives.
He grants them a condescending respect, sometimes even admiration, but they’re
not the equal of an Englishman. Good as it is, the book’s ideal audience is the
young; if I had read it when I was twelve it would have knocked my socks off.
The Eye -
Vladimir Nabokov (Russian)
This long short
story was fated to fail; its premise is too unwieldy. Yet Nabokov uses smoke
and mirrors to fashion a rickety plausibility. He plays with the idea of a
person viewing himself from outside himself – being merely a disembodied eye.
The eye constantly sees the contempt and indifference the world has for him. In
this outing Nabokov’s cruelty is tempered; in his Foreword he refers to his
character as “poor” Smurov, and I wonder if he could relate to him; the parade
of indignities he subjects Smurov to have a masochistic quality (was young
Nabokov rankled by the lack of recognition for his writing?). At the end Smurov
retreats into the realm of the imagination. He insists that he has found
happiness there; in dreams he can possess the woman he loves. His last (and
pitiable) words: “What more can I do to prove it, to proclaim that I am happy? Oh,
to shout it so that all of you believe me at last, you cruel, smug people . .
.”
No comments:
Post a Comment